Αδικοπραξία από Απάτη: Πότε Δικαιούστε Αποζημίωση Παράλληλα με την Ποινική Δίωξη

Fraud causing financial loss may trigger both criminal and civil remedies under Greek law. The two procedures serve different purposes: criminal proceedings concern the investigation and punishment of the offence, while a civil claim seeks compensation for the loss and, where the statutory requirements are met, monetary satisfaction for non-pecuniary harm.

Two Different Legal Bases Arising from the Same Conduct

Under Article 386 of the Greek Penal Code, fraud is committed where a person, seeking unlawful financial gain, damages another person’s property by inducing an act, omission or tolerance through the knowing presentation of false facts as true or the unlawful concealment or suppression of true facts.

The same conduct may establish civil liability for fraud in Greece under Article 914 of the Civil Code where unlawful and culpable conduct, damage and causation are proven. If the fraud concerns a legal transaction, Articles 147 et seq. of the Civil Code may also provide a right to annul that transaction. Annulment and damages are distinct remedies whose requirements must be examined separately.

Element Criminal fraud under Article 386 Civil tort under Article 914
Purpose Investigation of the offence and, if proven, imposition of the prescribed criminal sanction Compensation for financial loss and, where applicable, monetary satisfaction for non-pecuniary harm
Evidential assessment Guilt must be established to the degree of judicial conviction required for a criminal conviction The civil court evaluates evidence under Greek civil-procedure rules; the common-law phrase “preponderance of the evidence” does not describe the Greek system
Competent court Criminal court Civil court
Legal outcome Criminal judgment and criminal sanctions Judicial award of the civil remedies established by the evidence

 

What Changed in 2019: The Criminal Complaint Requirement

Prosecution of fraud under Article 386(1) requires a criminal complaint under Article 405 of the Penal Code. The complaint must be filed within three months from the date on which the entitled person learned both of the act and of the offender, or one of the participants, under Article 114.

Fraud causing total damage exceeding EUR 120,000 is a felony. Where such damage is caused directly to the Greek State, a public-law legal entity or a local authority, the special rule in Article 386(2) applies and prosecution is ex officio. The former criteria based on habitual or professional commission and a EUR 30,000 threshold are not elements of the current Article 386.

The injured party’s position in the criminal proceedings also changed with the current Code of Criminal Procedure:

Issue Before 1 July 2019 Current regime
Status of the injured party The injured party could participate as a civil claimant under the former rules Where entitled, the injured party may appear in support of the prosecution
Monetary claim in the criminal court A civil claim could include a monetary request within the limits of the former criminal procedure Supporting the prosecution is not a mechanism for an award of full compensation
Full recovery of loss It could also be connected with the civil claim in the criminal proceedings It is pursued through a separate action before the competent civil court

 

How Compensation Is Claimed Today

An injured party may, where entitled, appear in the criminal proceedings in support of the prosecution. This does not replace a civil action and does not result in the criminal court awarding full compensation.

A civil claim may include, depending on the facts:

  • actual financial loss;
  • loss of profit, where proven to the required standard;
  • statutory interest; and
  • reasonable monetary satisfaction for non-pecuniary harm under Article 932 of the Civil Code.

Filing a criminal complaint does not by itself secure repayment. Equally, a prior criminal conviction is not generally a prerequisite for a civil compensation claim arising from fraud. The civil court evaluates the evidence under Greek civil-procedure rules. It is inaccurate to describe the Greek evidential system through the common-law formula “preponderance of the evidence”.

Why Civil Proceedings May Also Be Necessary

The proceedings are autonomous and may progress in parallel. Under Article 250 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the civil court may adjourn the hearing pending completion of criminal proceedings, but no automatic stay arises merely because a criminal case is pending.

Final criminal judgments and the presumption of innocence must be treated consistently with the Greek Constitution and the European Convention on Human Rights. It is therefore unsafe to state categorically that an acquittal is irrelevant to a later civil case. Its effect depends on the wording and finality of the judgment, the civil cause of action and the particular facts.

In practice, a parallel civil assessment matters because:

  • supporting the prosecution does not replace a claim for full compensation;
  • a civil claim may generally be brought without awaiting a prior criminal conviction;
  • the action may include every proven financial claim and, where applicable, monetary satisfaction for non-pecuniary harm; and
  • the criminal judgment is assessed in the civil case, but its effect depends on its content and finality and on the presumption of innocence.

Limitation: The Claim May Survive Longer Than Expected

Under Article 937 of the Civil Code, a tort claim is barred five years after the injured party learned of the damage and the person liable and, in all cases, twenty years after the act. If the tort also constitutes a criminal offence subject to a longer limitation period, that longer period also applies to the civil compensation claim.

The calculation cannot safely be made solely by labelling the conduct a misdemeanour or felony. The date of the act, transitional criminal law, any suspension or interruption, the injured party’s knowledge and the precise form of the offence must all be considered.

Time issue General rule
Criminal complaint, where required Three months from knowledge of the act and of the offender or one of the participants; this is distinct from limitation of the civil claim
Tort claim Five years from knowledge of the loss and the liable person and, in all cases, twenty years from the act
Longer criminal limitation period It applies to the civil claim through Article 937(2), but the precise period depends on the form and date of the offence and the applicable transitional rules

 

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Is a criminal complaint enough to recover my money?

No. The complaint initiates the criminal process. Full financial recovery is generally pursued by a separate civil action before the competent civil court.

Must I wait for the criminal trial to finish?

Not necessarily. The civil claim may be brought independently, although the civil court may adjourn the case where the statutory conditions are met.

What is the deadline for filing the complaint?

As a rule, three months from knowledge of both the act and the offender where the relevant form of fraud is prosecuted following a complaint.

How long do I have to bring a civil damages claim?

Under Article 937, the basic period is five years from knowledge of the loss and the liable person and, in all cases, twenty years from the act. A longer criminal limitation period may apply to the civil claim, but the precise calculation depends on the particular offence, its date and the applicable transitional law.

Can I claim compensation for non-pecuniary harm?

Yes, where the tort and the conditions of Article 932 are established. The court determines a reasonable amount.

Does a criminal acquittal always prevent a civil claim?

There is no universal answer. The content and finality of the criminal judgment, the legal basis of the civil claim and the requirements of the presumption of innocence must be examined.

Conclusion

Criminal prosecution and civil damages for fraud under Greek law serve different purposes and require distinct procedural steps. Particular care is required with the three-month complaint period, proof of loss and the calculation of limitation periods.

This article is intended solely for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Each case requires an individual assessment based on its specific facts and the applicable legal framework. For specialised legal advice, please contact our law firm.

 

No comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *